Disagreement, Evidence, and the Doxastic Attitudes
Omschrijving
Disagreement is a pervasive feature of our intellectual lives. How should we respond to the problem of disagreement with someone whom we take to be our epistemic peer? Michele Palmira offers a framework for norms of inquiry according to which the rational response is to combine a process of double-checking with an attitude of hypothesis.
Ik heb een vraag over het boek:
‘The Rational Inquirer - Palmira, Michele (Ramon y Cajal Research Fellow’.
Vul het onderstaande formulier in.
We zullen zo spoedig mogelijk antwoorden.
